By willy kiprono
I am left wondering if the only
language that Moi University administration understands in regard to academic
trips is demonstration.
The same behavior has been used
by the government in dealing with teachers’ strikes and the varsity
administration is embracing the ‘norm’ wholeheartedly.
Students pursuing different
courses end up resolving to demonstration due to laxity of either the finance
office or person in charge to get the cheque needed for that trip.
It is a shame that an institution
of higher learning where dialogue is usually emphasized as a vital conflict
resolution method only understands the opposite. Most students are left
speculating if they must be ‘Sossions’ so that they can go for an educational
excursion they have fully paid for.
Fourth years in the department of
Linguistics and Foreign languages on late last year had to riot outside their
Dean’s office awaiting for a cheque that had taken too long to be signed. This
is after their trip was postponed for the second time and no official
communication had been given on Monday; the same day they were to leave for
their academic trip.
Barely a month before then,
students from the school of Business did the same and they were promised a
refund of their money, and on Friday last week, the admin bowed to their
demands. History will prove me right that the previous group of LMC and
Economic students did the same and they even locked up some varsity workers in
the administration block.
It’s very ironical that one
cannot do exams without fully paying their school fees in full yet the same
effect is not applied in a field.
The varsity should tell us if we must follow KNUT and KUPPET way so that we can go for a trip on a course that were have registered and fully paid for.
indeed we don't need to strike for us to go for a trip. the administration should style up.
ReplyDelete